You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.
Subject: Derek Chauvins trial
polo_011 20.04.21 - 10:38pm
best 4/20. * +
speedracer28 20.04.21 - 10:40pm
Defence was emotive for the most part. They relied on one piece of evidence extensively. But clearly that was enough to lead the jury to guilty verdict.
I'm wondering if the appeal would be different; maybe with all the crowd dying down a little, the court can examine points of law more impartially. * +
9362 20.04.21 - 10:42pm
A similar case though would also not be obscure * +
speedracer28 20.04.21 - 10:45pm
Nah, I'm sure many cases pass through the court room on a daily basis involving police brutality, but now you have smart phones and video recordings that can make an event viral. I'm only wondering how this can affect due process in long term. Possibly for better, but it can equally be so for worse. Imagine the media and society deciding someone's guilt or innocence before a trial has even been complete. * +
9362 20.04.21 - 10:46pm
People offering to help including people medically trained at the scene and the police telling them not to and how can you expect the crowd to be quiet if they see someone clearly struggling being no threat and being held down for too long? * +
speedracer28 20.04.21 - 10:50pm
Those are points of facts. I don't think they can be argued again in the appeal. Points of law are more about possible procedural errors during trial; questioning jury deliberation and whatnot. * +
xivanax 20.04.21 - 10:51pm
+ go to page 1-135
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
7 last page
+ bookmark
8 General Chat Forum
9 Forum Index