2014 for red dead 2?

Lol I'm not saying it won't be noticeable, I'm saying it'll be far less noticeable than 900p to 1080p and 1080 to 1440. 3200 x 1800 is a big big resolution. Most people aren't even accustomed to just 2560 x 1440.

To actually see a big difference you need a big big big HDTV and sit close to it. It's a fact of human biology. The gap visible between well upscaled 3200 x 1800 and 3840 x 2160 on a 55 inch UHD screen from say 6 feet away will be next to nothing, far smaller than current disparity between the consoles on an average 40+ incher. If you have a smaller screen or sit further away is pretty much physiologically impossible to see the difference.....

This is why it matters less whether Pro can't do native 4K and Scorpio can. Pro will have been out a whole year and have a good userbase. * +

spartan2 21.10.16 - 02:05pm

@ alvar89 - 21.10.16 - 05:36am
Phones yes but monitors and tv big difference in detail. Fhd text looks like a blurry brick wall. On phones the text crispness is noticable also between qhd and fhd. The difference between a 4k and fhd is 4x compared to the small bump to 1440 from 1080.

And really you haven't compared a QHD or a Z5 to a FHD one clearly. Put a FHD phone to your nose, you can barely even see the pixels the density is so high. You need a magnifying glass lol. 4K is super overkill for phone displays and most of the time looks no better. A very good FHD phone screen hands down beats an average 4k one. This is with a viewing distance of ooohhh, about two inches depending on your nose

Point being that there is a definite limit to human perception of resolution, and the more resolution there is the less tangible the difference is for sure. The polygon demonstration of diminishing returns comes to mind. * +

alvar89 21.10.16 - 07:17pm

@ spartan2 - 21.10.16 - 02:05pm
And really you haven't compared a QHD or a Z5 to a FHD one clearly. Put a FHD phone to your nose, you can barely even see the pixels the density is so high. You need a magnifying glass lol. 4K is super overkill for phone displays and most of the time looks no better. A very good FHD phone screen hands down beats an average 4k one. This is with a viewing distance of ooohhh, about two inches depending on your nose

Point being that there is a definite limit to human perception of resolution, and the more resolution there is the less tangible the difference is for sure. The polygon demonstration of diminishing returns comes to mind.

Was talking about a bigger screen difference being very noticable. On phones you can see the difference in very little text crispness. Its pointless on phone yes i agree on that. I have had 2 qhd phones so i have a bit of experience. On a pc monitor going from fhd to 4k is huge. All the extra grisp workspace and quality details and text. In games its a true upgrade one of the best available. On a monitor you are close also. A 27inch fhd monitor is a blurry brick wall compared to the 28inch uhd screens. * +

4juice 13.06.18 - 06:45pm

@ 4juice - 18.10.16 - 04:40pm
It will be pushed to 2018

Of course i get it right, 22nd oct 2018 yet the mugs on here said 2017 * +

norega 15.06.18 - 07:52am

@ 4juice - 13.06.18 - 06:45pm
Of course i get it right, 22nd oct 2018 yet the mugs on here said 2017

The only mug here is you and has always been you . Chinese delivery rat * +

4juice 20.07.18 - 07:58pm
Go kill yourself you benefits scrounging, bin dipping c**t * +

mrstabs 21.07.18 - 10:34pm
4skin still talking sh*t after all these years

* +