! You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

AMD FX 8150 - Page 2/2

Subject: AMD FX 8150
« <
spartan2 13.06.12 - 04:58pm
Rubbish. zzz The intels are better across the board, the only strong area for bulldozer is extreme multi threading which is a tiny percentage of average work load and the intels are not weak at that either * +

vamez26 14.06.12 - 03:17am
It does seem to work well when it comes to multitasking. The extra cores at work i reckon. * +

chr1s84 14.06.12 - 09:23am

@ vamez26 - 13.06.12 - 01:49pm
Bulldozer performs well at HD better than i7, and it is also better at multitasking.

lmao pmpl * +

meghertz 14.06.12 - 09:27am
amd is.great for budget chips. for power, it's intel. * +

jismjim 14.06.12 - 08:24pm
People still buy amd cpu's facepalm * +

jay.mack 18.06.12 - 04:04pm

@ meghertz - 14.06.12 - 09:27am
amd is.great for budget chips. for power, it's intel.

not any more m8. intel own the board now... there x2 i3 will give amds phenom 2 quads a run for there money. there cheaper, they cost less to run and will out perform them in most games.quad market is intels yes the 8150 can match the i5 2500k in some benches and even scr*pe a lead but thats 8 cores going flat out agains intels 4. if you step up to the 2600k intel takes the lead and amd has nothing to compare... sad but true... * +

jay.mack 18.06.12 - 04:07pm
im not kidding how bad they are in real world usage. gamers over at toms turn up in bunches on the release of a new high profile game saying why doesnt my amd perfom... they have everything from the 4100 up to the 8150 paired typically with a 560ti or 6870 or more and all say the same thing. wheres my fps... *

« <

Quick reply:

+ refresh
+ go to page 1-2
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
+ bookmark
8 Tech&Computers Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search