! You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

a.m.d is back - Page 35/38

Subject: a.m.d is back
« <> »
spartan2 10.01.11 - 02:49am
the fastest six core AMD can put out on pretty much everything. I said this a while ago, unless AMD find a dramatic architecture improvement they'll find themselves with massive expensive 12 core chips getting a*se kicked by cheapo small 8 core intels inside 18 month * +

spartan2 10.01.11 - 02:51am
The further you fall behind per core the bigger and bigger the performance gap will get as core numbers increase and the more and more die area you need just to have parity. It'll screw u bad * +

kin9p1n 10.01.11 - 02:59am
on the 5th of January Amd and Nvidia realised they were a full year behind Intel. * +

spartan2 10.01.11 - 03:01am
Nvidia because they build x86 chips. Or even have an x86 license in their name they havent tried to buy via alternate companies facepalm * +

f..u..n 10.01.11 - 03:32am
Translate ur 'stats' in laymans lingo. To sum1 like u 3008 means a great deal.. Also tell me (us) what ur comparing... Thanx * +

cheatman 10.01.11 - 06:21am
Guess they are comparing different bird cpu * +

jay.mack 10.01.11 - 07:18am
all i can say a.m.d is thats great for you, but for all your trouble you got very little in the way of actual performance.. i know you dont play many games but still your cpu will struggle to outperform even amd's low end am2+ or am3 parts. which are very very cheap. * +

« <> »

Quick reply:

+ go to page 1-38
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
7 last page
+ bookmark
8 Tech&Computers Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search