! You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

Resurrection historicity - Page 3/3

Subject: Resurrection historicity
« <
manszar 16.04.12 - 01:05pm
and just look at how many days it took the apostles to proclaim the resurrection. chin * +

manszar 16.04.12 - 01:10pm

@ mab21 - 16.04.12 - 12:51pm
There were rumours he was going to resurrect that's y they put guards at his tomb, the romans knew also.

they knew more than that. they would have seen what type of people they were. seen their intentions. * +

mab21 16.04.12 - 01:23pm
dontknowThey seem to me quite honest. * +

purest1 16.04.12 - 01:56pm

@ kimjongl - 16.04.12 - 01:02pm
considering them objectively or with bias is neither here nor there, if they aren't facts to begin with.

Its a historical report. What good reasons have we for doubting the record? * +

manszar 16.04.12 - 02:25pm

@ purest1 - 16.04.12 - 11:59am
The 'Jesus movement' was crushed and scattered for 3 or so days and only met in secret for fear of the other Jews when their championed messiah was executed. 3 or so days later they emerge and are fired up, even defying the sanherdrin in claiming that Jesus had risen. What just happened? Some went on to get killed by the Romans for their claims. What did they just witness?

wasnt It more than 40 days and didnt they only proclaim he was resurrected after he apparently ascended to heaven? Little convenient dont you think? chin * +

funybuni 16.04.12 - 03:46pm
People back then was ignorant and blinded by each others lies and not facts..thats why they didnt believe it happened.. * +

manszar 17.04.12 - 12:41pm
can you tell us the undisputable facts and the lies that blinded them? *

« <

Quick reply:

+ refresh
+ go to page 1-3
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
+ bookmark
8 Religion&Beliefs Forum
9 Forum Index

5 Top 0 Main 9 Forums
Custom Search