You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.
Subject: security council reform
Replies: 70 Views: 8329
kimjongl 5.02.12 - 10:07am
Do you think the UN security council needs to be overhauled? I think the veto powers should be taken away from the 5 permanent members and that general membership should rotate. * +
phallica 5.02.12 - 01:20pm
It should be, they all have conflicting interests, and will veto to benefit their own agenda. * +
nolisto1 5.02.12 - 01:37pm
Seems like someone doesn't believing in ruling by consensus. * +
nolisto1 5.02.12 - 01:44pm
we all know when push comes to shove the western members will always vote together, us,england, france. Therefore there must be consensus. If there isn't consensus it means, different nations view that situation differently, not just from one vantage point. You would expect that, as a result of different cultures. Etc. Etc. Etc. * +
nolisto1 5.02.12 - 01:47pm
i know kimjongl hates israel. Before you forget. Was it not the US that was going to veto any palestinian bid to be recognized as a state, or un member? * +
9362 5.02.12 - 02:05pm
england and france working together. * +
nolisto1 5.02.12 - 02:10pm
yes. England and France are western nations and more often than not will vote together. Its always going to be 3 against 2. Therefore consensus is needed from multiple different perspectives. * +
nolisto1 5.02.12 - 02:17pm
if we are to examine russia's opposition to the resolution you will see it is REASONABLE. the resolution is biased, it takes sides in the conflict and the nations supporting the resolution have already made up their minds about a solution to the dispute, which is anti- Assad. * +
+ go to page 1-10
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
7 last page
+ bookmark
8 Religion&Beliefs Forum
9 Forum Index