You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

Subject: scientists...
Replies: 18 Views: 1097

doom123 8.12.11 - 10:26am
cant see the wood for the trees? what im getting at is this... they use the proof of science to try and disprove a good , yet surely the proof of science in nature is the proof of god? they say life came about due to a soup becoming biological , so how did the fundemental*laws* arrive within reality? they couldnt evolve from nothing , just like given time a monkey could never type out a scene from * +

doom123 8.12.11 - 10:27am
*disprove a god* i meant...back to my musings.. scene from a shakespere play given time , it could never happen , its a fking lie... so lets move on and except god. * +

lucretia 8.12.11 - 10:29am
yes, EXCEPT god * +

manszar 8.12.11 - 10:52am
they are not trying to disprove GOD, just trying to understand how life happend on earth. * +

manszar 8.12.11 - 10:53am
many people dont like it because it disproves genisus * +

purest1 8.12.11 - 11:06am
Proving or disproving God is for philosophy, not science. Science is tentative and admits it can't explain everything. But it doesn't fill those Gaps with God. Scientists wont accept belief because they don't understand certain natural phenomena yet. They leave knowledge gaps for the advancement of knowledge to fill. Even if it takes centuries or millenia. * +

purest1 8.12.11 - 11:17am
God is to be accepted on faith, not scientific causation. If you try to test his existence using this route, trust me you will lose. You either have faith in his existence or you don't. He is not a directly and empirically present entity in our ordinary lives, hence his existence is not testable. * +

irnbrux 8.12.11 - 12:46pm
many scientists believe in the God conn * +

+ go to page 1-3
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
7 last page
+ bookmark
8 Religion&Beliefs Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search