You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

Subject: Problem in biblical chroniclers p-1

smohamed 6.10.11 - 04:35pm
anyways i g2g ..forgot to mention the same group had a squiz through the OT as well...same scenario only late man*scripts survive, all with the exception of the Dead Sea texts of Isaiah and Habakkuk and some fragments of other books * +

smohamed 6.10.11 - 04:35pm
we can discuss further tommorrow cheers * +

northie 6.10.11 - 04:36pm
Concerning the Word itself, there are no 'grave errors' in the source. Show me any. Those sources you are talking about were the NT sources that had many versions and many copy errors, yes. The oldest ones that could be found was used in later translations, although certain translators used man*scripts to their own liking - depending on the mesage they they wanted to convey (theological translati * +

northie 6.10.11 - 04:39pm
Some translations were doen through theological glasses. You find that with any work on earth, including the quran. More than a quarter of the verses in the quran doesn't make any sense at all, so the translators add words in brackets to give their own interpretation of what was supposed to be said. * +

smohamed 7.10.11 - 08:01am
translations is part of the matter.....as explained earlier...if the sources is marred with errors then you stuffed no matter how you try and justify it...and if compiler and scholars start adding their own definitions of what they endeavour as the message then the Word becomes corrupted with mans idealogies * +

drakess9 8.10.11 - 10:28am
I have inboxed you smo *

+ refresh
+ go to page 1-15
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
+ bookmark
8 Religion&Beliefs Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search