islamic history - Page 67/67

@ salam05 - 11.02.12 - 11:51am
And who is talking about narrations of Fasiq?? The case of a liar is different than any other sinner. As for the verse, then it is talkin about checkin the info of a fasiq. Suppose a liar came to with some info, would you then confirm it by asking another liar?? Some1 like you could do that but not a normal person. Rather when a liar tells you something then refer back to authentic sources, and then rely on authentic source without countin the statement of a liar to make the issue mutawatr.

very childish my dear son, Re-read my posts and checked the links i have provided then comment to the topic, just for ur kind info ikramah was not a liar narrator for sunnis, and yes he was a wicked person for shia scholars but he took that narration frm Ibn Abbas who was recognized as trustworthy narrator, there does exist other narrator other then ibn abb * +

mohsin_2 12.02.12 - 07:41pm
Ikrimah is a trustworthy for us. Not for you.This hadith is attributed to Ikrimah through Twelver narrators in Twelver books. We do not accept it here. If it was an authentic Sunni chain that ended with Ikrimah, then we would accept it. * +

ruler_56 13.02.12 - 03:19am

@ junaid23 - 24.09.11 - 06:40pm
Lolz turn d bad into good??? Then why hell is 4?? Btw u interprate the quranic verse, quran dint say so...U need to learn the meaning of aadil first... Strange faith pious and sinner without evn punishd 4his sins hv d same status wot an amazing justice

@ mohsin_2 - 12.02.12 - 07:41pm
Ikrimah is a trustworthy for us. Not for you.This hadith is attributed to Ikrimah through Twelver narrators in Twelver books. We do not accept it here. If it was an authentic Sunni chain that ended with Ikrimah, then we would accept it.

And ikramah is not the only one who narrate this hadith, IMAM BAQAR A.S also narrate the same sermon therefore it proves to be authentic. * +

junaid23 16.02.12 - 03:09am