ppls bailout basic income

Subject: ppls bailout basic income
Replies: 311 Views: 7058

jlh1182 5.06.16 - 08:53am
looks like its not such an impossible idea after all.. We have every negative comment thrown at this so lets see it get the right attention.. The aim here is for u to work out if ur basic costs can be met with 325.00 per week or 1300.00 per month.. This does not support a lavish lifestyle if u want that u still go to work for it.. This is bills, accom, groceries, medicine ect just basics.. * +

jlh1182 5.06.16 - 08:59am
if there are basic necessitys that cost too much then state what they are to see if the economy can find a way to lower the costs, such as surgery, dental care, these already have nhs support, others like kitchen appliances for health and hygiene ect, mortgage repayments ect, anything, if u need it and its too high for this budget, hash it out to see if theres a way to change it.. * +

jlh1182 5.06.16 - 09:07am
perhaps keeping a car is too much for this budget, then ok look at using public transport if its essential- if its that important to have a car then work to keep it.. Theres absolutely no reason why this would mean nobody has anything, or everything is worth nothing thats outragous, the aim here is to end poverty and its not such an idea that is absurd, its being considered by ppl who understand economics well enough.. * +

mabsy21nausika 5.06.16 - 09:08am
the good part is you don't have to work and you still get the same amount as someone who works... imagine that...

* +

jlh1182 5.06.16 - 09:15am
in my present situation i would cover rent and utilities having 200 per week to cover living expenses, food, transport, clothing, even some rental products could be sustained however its possible to save and buy outright instead with this income.. I suppose the issue is really healthcare, i would need to continue paying national insurance and tax to cover nhs subsidy and assistance from emergency services if required.. * +

mabsy21nausika 5.06.16 - 09:16am
as long is it doesen't encourage ppl not to work I don't care tbh, in a way seems like a good idea to me too but as long as one is young and strong should work for the money imo * +

jlh1182 5.06.16 - 09:20am

@ mabsy21nausika - 5.06.16 - 09:08am
the good part is you don't have to work and you still get the same amount as someone who works... imagine that...

not true, the person who doesnt work only gets 325 per wekk and is going to need to spend it to live on.. Whereas the person who works has the 325 same plus whatever they earn in the job they do.. In effect those who work now, from their take home pay a portion goes to bills ect- this would relieve them of that expenditure so long as it wasnt to high to.. What would 1300.00 per month do to ur life working or not? * +

mabsy21nausika 5.06.16 - 09:27am

@ jlh1182 - 5.06.16 - 09:20am
not true, the person who doesnt work only gets 325 per wekk and is going to need to spend it to live on.. Whereas the person who works has the 325 same plus whatever they earn in the job they do.. In effect those who work now, from their take home pay a portion goes to bills ect- this would relieve them of that expenditure so long as it wasnt to high to.. What would 1300.00 per month do to ur life working or not?

it's a good income to survive in a decent manner, unless you have side problems like health issues let's say and you have to spend money on medicamention aside from bills food and transportation... * +