asylum seekers - Page 46/46

Going to backtrack a little on that statement but it could easily be counter productive * +

lugus 23.07.13 - 10:47am

@ vovo2012 - 21.07.13 - 01:49am
I know this is a very touchy subject for all on this site. What are your views on this. We also have to remember that seeking asylum is actually a basic human right. currently we are having problems with people on boats entering Australia this way. I hope we can keep this topic as peaceful as possible

Every Nation has a duty to take in genuine Asylum seekers however there are so many bogus claimants that its become a political hot potato in most nations * +

recurv11 23.07.13 - 11:02am

@ 9362 - 22.07.13 - 12:28am
I.e if we are seen to target a country,genuine buisnessmen from that country would think why should i do buisness with a country what treats us like that?

International businessmen will do business ANYWHERE regardless of immigration, do u think arms dealers, gold and diamond dealers, bankers etc give a sh.it ? * +

recurve16 1.07.19 - 03:46pm
Taxpayers have shelled out 10MILLION in just five years on 'phantom' flights to return failed asylum seekers that are abandoned before take-off

The eye-watering costs, caused by last-ditch appeals and individuals refusing go quietly, have sparked renewed demands for the system to be tightened up.

MPs told MailOnline the airline industry was 'making quite a lot of money' due to the Home Office's failure to negotiate better contracts.

Problems arise when officials book seats only for legal challenges to be launched against deportation at the last minute - meaning they have to be abandoned.

There has been criticism that the Human Rights Act is being abused to drag out cases.

Poorly-trained staff are also allegedly adding to the issues by trying to put disruptive individuals on planes alone - with pilots then refusing to have them on board...

* +

bozzalad 1.07.19 - 04:21pm

@ recurve16 - 1.07.19 - 03:46pm
Taxpayers have shelled out 10MILLION in just five years on 'phantom' flights to return failed asylum seekers that are abandoned before take-off

The eye-watering costs, caused by last-ditch appeals and individuals refusing go quietly, have sparked renewed demands for the system to be tightened up.

MPs told MailOnline the airline industry was 'making quite a lot of money' due to the Home Office's failure to negotiate better contracts.

Problems arise when officials book seats only for legal challenges to be launched against deportation at the last minute - meaning they have to be abandoned.

There has been criticism that the Human Rights Act is being abused to drag out cases.

Poorly-trained staff are also allegedly adding to the issues by trying to put disruptive individuals on planes alone - with pilots then refusing to have them on board...