! You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

2014 for red dead 2? - Page 12/14

Subject: 2014 for red dead 2?
« <> »
mcwalnut 20.10.16 - 11:25pm

@ norega - 20.10.16 - 09:41pm
Let the peasants beta test it for the master race.

Odd.. I remember hearing the same thing about RDR. lmao.gif * +

mcwalnut 21.10.16 - 01:01am
Oh but don't worry PC gamers.. Rockstar and Sony are throwing you a bone. RDR will be made available on PC via psnow. lol.gif * +

alvar89 21.10.16 - 05:36am

@ spartan2 - 20.10.16 - 10:36pm
It won't even matter that much at that resolution. It's one thing seeing the difference between well upscaled 1600 x 900 and 1920 x 1080 native on a 50 inch HDTV. Entirely another trying to pick apart 3840 x 2160 and for example 3200 x 1800 on the same size screen.

If Scorpio can do native 4K then Pro should be able to do 3200 x 1800 on the same game which is still a massive resolution. It really is. It'll be even harder to tell apart on anything less than some enormous screen in your home.

Diminishing returns for sure. It's obvious for phones, most human eyes can easily see a gap between 720p and FHD 1080p phone screens, but it's actually very difficult seeing much of a difference between UHD and just FHD on a phone screen despite having 4x the resolution. The more resolution the less difference anyone can pick out. Fact.

Phones yes but monitors and tv big difference in detail. Fhd text looks like a blurry brick wall. On phones the text crispness is noticable also between qhd and fhd. The difference between a 4k and fhd is 4x compared to the small bump to 1440 from 1080. * +

alvar89 21.10.16 - 05:39am
The 1800p cut back from 2160p will be noticable the same way 1080p and 1440p. * +

norega 21.10.16 - 07:10am

@ spartan2 - 20.10.16 - 10:36pm
It won't even matter that much at that resolution. It's one thing seeing the difference between well upscaled 1600 x 900 and 1920 x 1080 native on a 50 inch HDTV. Entirely another trying to pick apart 3840 x 2160 and for example 3200 x 1800 on the same size screen.

If Scorpio can do native 4K then Pro should be able to do 3200 x 1800 on the same game which is still a massive resolution. It really is. It'll be even harder to tell apart on anything less than some enormous screen in your home.

Diminishing returns for sure. It's obvious for phones, most human eyes can easily see a gap between 720p and FHD 1080p phone screens, but it's actually very difficult seeing much of a difference between UHD and just FHD on a phone screen despite having 4x the resolution. The more resolution the less difference anyone can pick out. Fact.

So you keep telling yourself . Get a 4k TV hook up your PC play something like gta5 with enhancer mod . We heard the same thing back with ps3/Xbox that no one could tell the difference between 720p/1080 . Fact is scorpio will murder ps4 at 4k even if it has no games it's still way more power and Sony fangirls are crying about it making up excuses why 4k isn't that great . * +

norega 21.10.16 - 07:12am

@ mcwalnut - 21.10.16 - 01:01am
Oh but don't worry PC gamers.. Rockstar and Sony are throwing you a bone. RDR will be made available on PC via psnow. lol.gif

PS now will give you that full on console experience complete with lag and stutteringlol.gif * +

alvar89 21.10.16 - 09:42am

@ norega - 21.10.16 - 07:12am
PS now will give you that full on console experience complete with lag and stutteringlol.gif

Plus the latency from stream lol * +

« <> »

Quick reply:

+ go to page 1-14
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
7 last page
+ bookmark
8 Games Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search