You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

Subject: Freeview
Replies: 7 Views: 1093

mark522 19.11.09 - 01:32am
Any views on the BBC's disgraceful decision to axe the 302 interactive stream meaning that there will be less choice during coverage of formula 1, snooker, Wimbledon, etc. * +

moonbeam 19.11.09 - 03:30am
its da 1st iv heard of it, i dnt care bout da sports but i likd da choice wen festivals r on * +

dawndark 19.11.09 - 10:40am
Ssh moanin i cant even get freeview! :( * +

moonbeam 19.11.09 - 06:59pm
i wudnt worry bout freeview atm as its not as gud as it usd 2 b imo, if anyfin da signals r getin worse * +

dawndark 20.11.09 - 10:35pm
that makes no sense. Licence fee goes up. Quality goes down! Only in the uk! * +

brothock 23.11.09 - 09:08am
The picture quality gets reduced each time they squeeze in another channel. Meanwhile, as audiences are split between more channels and advertising revenue reduces due to the internet and the recession, programme quality reduces. Channels are also selling off their nighttime hours to dial-a-tart channels. * +

brothock 23.11.09 - 09:18am
The BBC had to remove 302, because the government decided that HD would have to be fitted in to the existing freeview space, so that in the future some of the current tv frequencies can be sold off, most likely to mobile networks. It is a shame that there is so much other rubbish on freeview now, and its the BBC are who are losing space. Its worth noting that if ITV digital hadn't failed we would've never had 301 and 302. * +

1jamster 24.11.09 - 12:33am
AYE A CANT RECEIVE THAT CHANNEL NOW. IT WAS A GREAT CHANNEL SUMETIMES 4 SPORT O MUSIC HIGHLIGHTS. *

+ refresh
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
+ bookmark
8 Fun&Media Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search